August 28, 2004
My Saturday morning routine is like this (with some parts excised because this is, after all, a family blog): Get out of bed, stumble into kitchen, start coffee, check email.
Usually, I don’t get much of anything — even the hate mail has slowed up some. I must be losing my touch.
Anyway, I’ve been using the Google News alerts to email me links when certain events happen. It’s very cool, and only rarely sends irrelevant items.
I expected to get at least one alert this morning, as related to my earlier post so I didn’t pay too much attention to it when I first opened the alert.
As is my habit, I’ll often click over to read something else in the middle of a post while I try to get my thoughts together. (All two of them.) So, I went back to my mail client (Thunderbird, in case you were wondering) and read the rest of the alerts.
There was one entitled, “Doctor faces murder charges for ‘mercy killings’.” Mercy killings? Ennis?
Long story short (yeah, right), it was the doctor who used to practice in our local clinic before he hung out his own shingle. I always thought of him as mainly goofy, and a borderline quack, so I guess I’m not overly surprised now that I’ve had a couple hours or so to digest the news.
My first reaction was an out loud, “Oh my God.”
The odd thing is that the incident was right around a year ago, in the same time frame as Jamie’s murder. Give or take a little bit, but given the previous murder rate (essentially zero since the beginning of time) in Ennis, that’s quite a coincidence.
In reading the article, I get the distinct impression that he knew what he was doing, and went ahead and did it.
But Bischoff said charges weren’t filed earlier because none of the family members were willing to testify against him.
[. . .]
“I gave her a shot to make her feel more comfortable and ease her suffering,” he said. “Three or four of her family members wrote me thank you letters.” (Emphasis mine. –Ed.)
This is just bizarre.
No responses to "Montana’s Dr. Death"
No comments yet.
Leave a comment